FLASHBACK FEBRUARY: Today's Featured Article

The Rest Of Us: Wine Blogging Outside Of Wine Country

I read a lot of wine blogs and most of them are by people that are right there in the thick of things. Sonoma in particular seems to be the...

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Wine Review: Black's Station Yolo County Red Blend 2014

Black's Station Red Blend 2014

My old friends at Matchbook Wine Company are back on the blog! I've done a lot of work with Matchbook, as you can see by doing a quick search on the blog or by clicking this link. And if you'd like to learn more about Matchbook, just read my article A Brief History of Matchbook Wine Company.

This time I'll be checking out their new label, Black's Station. Black's Station is what the town of Zamora, within Dunnigan Hills, used to be named. Needless to say, the vineyards that make these wines are in Zamora. I've already tried Black's  Stations 2015 Chardonnay and the 2015 Malbec. Now I'm trying the 2014 Red Blend before I finish with the 2015 Cabernet Sauvignon.

After an insane day at work, I'm about to pass out at my desk. Let's do this one quickly so I can curl up with my wife and baby and get yelled at for falling asleep too early.

The 2014 Red Blend is 75% Malbec, 15% Petit Verdot, 10% Cabernet Sauvignon, and has an ABV of 13.9%. The color of the wine is ruby red with slight hint of purple. On the nose I get violets, cherries, raspberries, chocolate, and fine black table pepper. It's a nice nose but in the mouth it's a little flat. It has a medium body, soft tannin, an acidity that's strangely all over the place, and it all just seems a bit unbalanced. There is a bit of leather on the palate to keep things interesting, but it's mostly sticky red fruit flavors without the gusto to back it up. And everything fades quickly on the flat finish. Hmmmm... faulty bottle? Heat stroke? Maybe???

This guy was awarded 88 points and a Best Buy from Wine Enthusiast, so you might want to listen to them because I'm just not feelin' it. It's not BAD but I'm just not getting the personality that I expect from Matchbook. And, unfortunately, it does seem pretty unbalanced. That said, I've had far worse for $12 red blends. Much, much worse.

Price: $12
Rating: 2.5/5 = Not Impressive / Satisfying (what does that mean?)

The bottle used was supplied free of charge for the purpose of this review. To have your wine reviewed follow this link.


Post a Comment


ABriefHistoryOf Aglianico Airen Albarino Aleatico Apothic Argentina Australia Austria Barbera beer Best Of biodynamic blend blog Bonarda book Bordeaux Brachetto brandy Bulgaria Cabernet Franc Cabernet Sauvignon California Campania Canada Cape Cod Carignan Carmenere Cava certification Chablis Champagne Chardonnay cheese Chenin Blanc Chianti Chile Cinsault cocktails Cognac Colombard Counoise CSW dessert wine Distill Wars Fiano formulas France Furmint Gamay Garganega Germany gin Graciano Greece Grenache Grenache Blanc Gruner Veltliner GSM guest blog Heroes history how to Hungary Israel Italy Kansas kosher Lambrusco Languedoc Loire love letter Madeira Malbec Marsanne Massachusetts Mavrud Mazuelo Meritage Merlot Mexico mixology Montepulciano Moscato Mourvédre Muscat mythology Nebbiolo New York New Zealand Norello Mascalese Oregon organic organicc original meme Palestine Pecorino Petit Verdot Petite Sirah Petite Verdot photo gallery phylloxera Picpoul Piedmont Pinot Blanc Pinot Gris/Grigio Pinot Noir Pinotage Port Portugal product Prosecco quote recipe retail problems review Rhone Ribera del Duero Riesling Rioja rose Roussanne Rueda rum Sangiovese Sangria Sauvignon Blanc science Sekt Seyval Blanc Sherry South Africa Spain Sparkling spirits study sulfites sustainable SWE Syrah Tannat Tempranillo Tequila Texas Torrontes Traminer Turkey Tuscany Umbria USA Valpolicella Verdejo Verdicchio Vermentino Vernacca video Vinho Verde Viognier Virginia Viura vodka Washington State whiskey White zinfandel wine wine club Wine Pick Zinfandel Zweigelt

Trending Posts